🔗 Share this article

You've likely seen the Hitchcock classic, The Silence of the Lambs, and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre. Perhaps you've also explored the original novels that served as the basis for the first two films. Now prepare to encounter the individual who inspired the Bates Motel owner, the serial killer, and the chainsaw-wielding villain. The infamous Ed Gein!

The initial installments of the series in question centered around the Milwaukee monster – an individual possessing strong recognition. This was followed by the sibling duo – a more niche story for enthusiasts of the genre. Now the spotlight turns to the Butcher of Plainfield. Although he doesn't possess the brand recognition of other notorious killers, and his confirmed victims number just two, his grave desecrations and gruesome creativity with the deceased have made a profound impact. Even now, any film or show featuring dismembered remains, removed epidermis, or skin-based artifacts probably owes a debt to his actions from over 70 years ago.

A Tone of Flippancy

Do I sound flippant? It's clearly the deliberate approach of the production team. It's uncommon to witness a television series that lingers so gleefully on the most heinous acts a person – and humanity – can commit. This extends to a significant plotline devoted to Nazi atrocities, presented with minimal moral context.

Structural and Stylistic Strengths

In terms of construction and style, the series excels. The pacing is flawless, and the skillful blending of past and present is handled masterfully. Viewers witness the actor as the killer in action – the murders, tomb violations, and assembling his collection. Simultaneously, the present-day narrative follows Alfred Hitchcock, Robert Bloch, and Anthony Perkins as they develop Psycho from the literary source. The blending of factual elements – Gein's religious mother and his obsession with women resembling her – and the unreal – lurid portrayals of the Buchenwald criminal and Nazi party scenes – is handled with technical skill.

The Glaring Omission

What it lacks, in a truly unacceptable way, is any moral dimension or deeper insight to offset the protracted, admiring visuals of Gein's depraved acts. The show presents his vibrant fantasy life and frames him as a helpless individual of his domineering mother and an accomplice with dark interests. The underlying suggestion seems to be: What is a poor, schizophrenic guy to do? In one scene, Robert Bloch theorizes that without seeing certain images, Gein would have remained an unremarkable local.

A Departure from Precedent

One might contend that a show from this stable – known for sleek, exaggerated aesthetics – is the wrong place for deep psychological exploration. However, earlier series like The People v OJ Simpson offered brilliant commentary on the press and the legal system. The Assassination of Gianni Versace explored celebrity and society. Impeachment examined systemic sexism. Thus, it is possible, and the producer has succeeded before.

The Final Verdict

But not here. This installment feels like an exploitation of a lesser-known criminal case. It asks for empathy for the man behind the masks without providing understanding into how he became a monster. Beyond the simplistic "religious mother" reasoning, there is no attempt to understand the creation or avert similar tragedies. It is nothing but voyeuristic pandering to the basest instincts of viewers. The wartime sequences do have lovely lighting, though.